Lawyers for Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels Sling More (Legal) Mud

Michael Avenatti, lawyer for the porn star Stormy Daniels, was accused by lawyers for Michael D. Cohen of “fanning a media storm” with his TV appearances and social media posts.

Lawyers for Michael D. Cohen, President Trump’s longtime fixer, and for Stephanie Clifford, the pornographic actress who says she slept with Mr. Trump, attacked one another in dueling memos filed on Friday evening as the circuslike case in Manhattan continued to devolve into a bitter legal grudge match.

One minute before their court-ordered deadline of 5 p.m., Mr. Cohen’s lawyers filed a scathing motion asking a judge to keep Ms. Clifford’s lawyer, Michael Avenatti, from formally entering the case, saying he was “fanning a media storm” and had been “smearing” Mr. Cohen in recent weeks in a relentless series of TV appearances and social media posts.

About two hours later, Mr. Avenatti fired back with his own motion, arguing that many of his adversaries’ assaults on him were “unsubstantiated,” “baseless” and lacking in “admissible evidence.”

The mutual broadsides were only the latest round of sparring in a battle between the proxies for Mr. Cohen and Ms. Clifford, who appeared onscreen as Stormy Daniels. That battle has been dragging on for weeks now in almost every conceivable venue: in court filings, at legal hearings, on Twitter and on television news shows.

It all began in April when federal agents armed with search warrants seized reams of documents and data in a series of raids on Mr. Cohen’s office, apartment and hotel room as part of an investigation into whether he broke the law by — among other acts — paying Ms. Clifford $130,000 not to speak about an affair she claims she had with Mr. Trump. Ever since the raids, Mr. Avenatti has been trying to be formally admitted to the case to protect any records related to Ms. Clifford that were swept up in the searches. But at the same time, Mr. Avenatti has been waging an unyielding publicity campaign against Mr. Cohen, Mr. Trump and other members of the Trump legal camp, appearing on TV — by Mr. Cohen’s lawyers’ count — 147 times in the last 10 weeks alone.

Last week, Mr. Avenatti created a firestorm when he released a report — apparently based on private bank records — that showed that a shell company owned by Mr. Cohen received millions of dollars from a firm with links to a Russian oligarch and from major corporations, including AT&T and the drug maker Novartis. In the following days, Mr. Avenatti accused Mr. Cohen of meeting with a representative from Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund; claimed that Mr. Trump may have bought the silence of two additional (and, for now, unnamed) women; and posted on Twitter a video of Mr. Trump’s lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, in women’s clothing — though only after, it should be said, Mr. Giuliani called Mr. Avenatti a “pimp.”

All of this, Mr. Cohen’s lawyers noted in their memo, was sufficient reason for Judge Kimba M. Wood, who is handling the matter in Federal District Court in Manhattan, to deny Mr. Avenatti’s request for admission to the case. “To our knowledge, this court has never been presented with clearer evidence of the deliberate creation of a carnival atmosphere and inappropriate conduct while an attorney’s application for admission was pending,” the lawyers wrote. “Moreover, this is an unprecedented attack on an individual who has not been charged with any crime.”

As the two sides have traded salvos, a much more sober legal process has been taking place. A special master, Barbara S. Jones, has been sorting through the reams of materials seized from Mr. Cohen to determine which among them are protected by the attorney-client privilege that Mr. Cohen shared with Mr. Trump. Though Mr. Cohen’s lawyers acknowledged that applications like Mr. Avenatti’s are rarely denied, they said that his conduct warranted keeping him out of the case so that Ms. Jones’ “orderly judicial procedures” can proceed without distraction.

Chief among those distractions was the report Mr. Avenatti released, claiming that Mr. Cohen’s company, Essential Consultants, had taken questionable payments from several sources, including a firm with links to the Russian oligarch, Viktor Vekselberg. In their memo filed on Friday, Mr. Cohen’s lawyers said that the report was marred by “inaccurate statements” and that even some of the accurate information it contained came from an unlawful source.

“Mr. Avenatti appears to be primarily focused on smearing Mr. Cohen publicly,” the lawyers wrote, “in his efforts to further his own interest in garnering as much media attention as possible.”

In a brief interview on Friday night, Mr. Avenatti maintained that he was hardly to blame for the spectacle-like nature of the case.

“Because of the stakes,” he said, “this would be a circus with us or without us.”

In Other News

fake money

Keywords clouds text link

 máy sấy   thịt bò mỹ  thành lập doanh nghiệp
Visunhomegương trang trí  nội thất  cửa kính cường lực   lắp camera Song Phát thiết kế nhà 

Our PBN System:  thiết kế nhà xưởng thiết kế nội thất thiết kế nhà tem chống giả ban nhạ  ốp lưngGiường ngủ triệu gia  Ku bet ku casino buy fake money máy sấy buồn sấy lạnh

mặt nạ  mặt nạ ngủ  Mặt nạ môi mặt nạ bùn mặt nạ kem mặt nạ bột mặt nạ tẩy tế bào chết  mặt nạ đất sét mặt nạ giấy mặt nạ dưỡng mặt nạ đắp mặt  mặt nạ trị mụn
mặt nạ tế bào gốc mặt nạ trị nám tem chống giả  công ty tổ chức sự kiện tổ chức sự kiện
Ku bet ku casino
Sâm tươi hàn quốc trần thạch cao trần thạch cao đẹp

suất ăn công nghiệpcung cấp suất ăn công nghiệp

© 2020 US News. All Rights Reserved.